HI all!
I am on dial-up and thus very aware of the time taken for some pages to load, especially when there are images present. So I have been pondering whether we really need to use the "www." part of the URL when we hyperlink from a page on our site to another internal page.
With the www. present doesn't the search for the object page not then go out into the world wide web to find it, when all the time it has been sitting in the same directory? If we miss-out the www. bit does "it" know to look for the object page in the same directory, and, if so won't that be faster?
I am new to this and it may be a dumb question but as they say "the only dumb question is the one not asked".
Thanks
John
www.clanfootball.com - "connecting fans around the world"
I am on dial-up and thus very aware of the time taken for some pages to load, especially when there are images present. So I have been pondering whether we really need to use the "www." part of the URL when we hyperlink from a page on our site to another internal page.
With the www. present doesn't the search for the object page not then go out into the world wide web to find it, when all the time it has been sitting in the same directory? If we miss-out the www. bit does "it" know to look for the object page in the same directory, and, if so won't that be faster?
I am new to this and it may be a dumb question but as they say "the only dumb question is the one not asked".
Thanks
John
www.clanfootball.com - "connecting fans around the world"
Comment