Re: Are reciprocal links the way to go ???
Maybe I'm one to see beyond "methods" to create traffic or true relevancy that are not entirely "genuine." And, if you are confident that this technobabble between "Company name" and actual hard-links generate "credit" is a real discussion you are free to postulate as much as you desire.
I maintain that in answering Dave's original question accurately, I emphatically respond "No."
Flipping the coin once more, I can see where I missed an element that may be my personal "methodology" was not even explained to the benefit of other readers of this thread: I have been very careful to obtain domains that in full normative language are the exact name of the companies they represent, and are always presented online as "hard." My companies names, their links, and 100% of all the volumuous precisely crafted deep Content provides a rich relevancy that easily provides the means for dominance via Hard-Rank Searches alone.
This whole discussion (despite the erroneous premise) is like trying to catch an elephant with a snare trap built with silk cord and ivory chopsticks.......and your last post (#15) is so self-conflicting without any furtherance, it appears to be more confused and confusing than contributory.
IMO
Maybe I'm one to see beyond "methods" to create traffic or true relevancy that are not entirely "genuine." And, if you are confident that this technobabble between "Company name" and actual hard-links generate "credit" is a real discussion you are free to postulate as much as you desire.
I maintain that in answering Dave's original question accurately, I emphatically respond "No."
Flipping the coin once more, I can see where I missed an element that may be my personal "methodology" was not even explained to the benefit of other readers of this thread: I have been very careful to obtain domains that in full normative language are the exact name of the companies they represent, and are always presented online as "hard." My companies names, their links, and 100% of all the volumuous precisely crafted deep Content provides a rich relevancy that easily provides the means for dominance via Hard-Rank Searches alone.
This whole discussion (despite the erroneous premise) is like trying to catch an elephant with a snare trap built with silk cord and ivory chopsticks.......and your last post (#15) is so self-conflicting without any furtherance, it appears to be more confused and confusing than contributory.
IMO
Comment